LIVE NEWS
  • Calls for Global Digital Estate Standard as Fraud Risk Grows
  • An ode to craftsmanship in software development
  • Global economy must stop pandering to ‘frivolous desires of ultra-rich’, says UN expert | Environment
  • Some Middle East Flights Resume but Confusion Reigns From Iran Strikes
  • Clinton Deposition Videos Released in Epstein Investigation
  • Elevance stock tumbles as CMS may halt Medicare enrollment
  • Wild spaces for butterflies to be created in Glasgow
  • You can now adjust how your caller card looks for calls on Android phones
Prime Reports
  • Home
  • Popular Now
  • Crypto
  • Cybersecurity
  • Economy
  • Geopolitics
  • Global Markets
  • Politics
  • See More
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Climate Risks
    • Defense
    • Healthcare Innovation
    • Science
    • Technology
    • World
Prime Reports
  • Home
  • Popular Now
  • Crypto
  • Cybersecurity
  • Economy
  • Geopolitics
  • Global Markets
  • Politics
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Climate Risks
  • Defense
  • Healthcare Innovation
  • Science
  • Technology
  • World
Home»Artificial Intelligence»How to Design an Agentic Workflow for Tool-Driven Route Optimization with Deterministic Computation and Structured Outputs
Artificial Intelligence

How to Design an Agentic Workflow for Tool-Driven Route Optimization with Deterministic Computation and Structured Outputs

primereportsBy primereportsFebruary 21, 2026No Comments7 Mins Read
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
How to Design an Agentic Workflow for Tool-Driven Route Optimization with Deterministic Computation and Structured Outputs
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


In this tutorial, we build a production-style Route Optimizer Agent for a logistics dispatch center using the latest LangChain agent APIs. We design a tool-driven workflow in which the agent reliably computes distances, ETAs, and optimal routes rather than guessing, and we enforce structured outputs to make the results directly usable in downstream systems. We integrate geographic calculations, configurable speed profiles, traffic buffers, and multi-stop route optimization, ensuring the agent behaves deterministically while still reasoning flexibly through tools.

!pip -q install -U langchain langchain-openai pydantic


import os
from getpass import getpass


if not os.environ.get("OPENAI_API_KEY"):
   os.environ["OPENAI_API_KEY"] = getpass("Enter OPENAI_API_KEY (input hidden): ")


from typing import Dict, List, Optional, Tuple, Any
from math import radians, sin, cos, sqrt, atan2


from pydantic import BaseModel, Field, ValidationError


from langchain_openai import ChatOpenAI
from langchain.tools import tool
from langchain.agents import create_agent

We set up the execution environment and ensure all required libraries are installed and imported correctly. We securely load the OpenAI API key so the agent can interact with the language model without hardcoding credentials. We also prepare the core dependencies that power tools, agents, and structured outputs.

SITES: Dict[str, Dict[str, Any]] = {
   "Rig_A": {"lat": 23.5880, "lon": 58.3829, "type": "rig"},
   "Rig_B": {"lat": 23.6100, "lon": 58.5400, "type": "rig"},
   "Rig_C": {"lat": 23.4500, "lon": 58.3000, "type": "rig"},
   "Yard_Main": {"lat": 23.5700, "lon": 58.4100, "type": "yard"},
   "Depot_1": {"lat": 23.5200, "lon": 58.4700, "type": "depot"},
   "Depot_2": {"lat": 23.6400, "lon": 58.4300, "type": "depot"},
}


SPEED_PROFILES: Dict[str, float] = {
   "highway": 90.0,
   "arterial": 65.0,
   "local": 45.0,
}


DEFAULT_TRAFFIC_MULTIPLIER = 1.10


def haversine_km(lat1: float, lon1: float, lat2: float, lon2: float) -> float:
   R = 6371.0
   dlat = radians(lat2 - lat1)
   dlon = radians(lon2 - lon1)
   a = sin(dlat / 2) ** 2 + cos(radians(lat1)) * cos(radians(lat2)) * sin(dlon / 2) ** 2
   return R * c

We define the core domain data representing rigs, yards, and depots along with their geographic coordinates. We establish speed profiles and a default traffic multiplier to reflect realistic driving conditions. We also implement the Haversine distance function, which serves as the mathematical backbone of all routing decisions.

def _normalize_site_name(name: str) -> str:
   return name.strip()


def _assert_site_exists(name: str) -> None:
   if name not in SITES:
       raise ValueError(f"Unknown site '{name}'. Use list_sites() or suggest_site().")


def _distance_between(a: str, b: str) -> float:
   _assert_site_exists(a)
   _assert_site_exists(b)
   sa, sb = SITES[a], SITES[b]
   return float(haversine_km(sa["lat"], sa["lon"], sb["lat"], sb["lon"]))


def _eta_minutes(distance_km: float, speed_kmph: float, traffic_multiplier: float) -> float:
   speed = max(float(speed_kmph), 1e-6)
   base_minutes = (distance_km / speed) * 60.0
   return float(base_minutes * max(float(traffic_multiplier), 0.0))


def compute_route_metrics(path: List[str], speed_kmph: float, traffic_multiplier: float) -> Dict[str, Any]:
   if len(path) < 2:
       raise ValueError("Route path must include at least origin and destination.")
   for s in path:
       _assert_site_exists(s)
   legs = []
   total_km = 0.0
   total_min = 0.0
   for i in range(len(path) - 1):
       a, b = path[i], path[i + 1]
       d_km = _distance_between(a, b)
       t_min = _eta_minutes(d_km, speed_kmph, traffic_multiplier)
       legs.append({"from": a, "to": b, "distance_km": d_km, "eta_minutes": t_min})
       total_km += d_km
       total_min += t_min
   return {"route": path, "distance_km": float(total_km), "eta_minutes": float(total_min), "legs": legs}

We build the low-level utility functions that validate site names and compute distances and travel times. We implement logic to calculate per-leg and total route metrics deterministically. This ensures that every ETA and distance returned by the agent is based on explicit computation rather than inference.

def _all_paths_with_waypoints(origin: str, destination: str, waypoints: List[str], max_stops: int) -> List[List[str]]:
   from itertools import permutations
   waypoints = [w for w in waypoints if w not in (origin, destination)]
   max_stops = int(max(0, max_stops))
   candidates = []
   for k in range(0, min(len(waypoints), max_stops) + 1):
       for perm in permutations(waypoints, k):
           candidates.append([origin, *perm, destination])
   if [origin, destination] not in candidates:
       candidates.insert(0, [origin, destination])
   return candidates


def find_best_route(origin: str, destination: str, allowed_waypoints: Optional[List[str]], max_stops: int, speed_kmph: float, traffic_multiplier: float, objective: str, top_k: int) -> Dict[str, Any]:
   origin = _normalize_site_name(origin)
   destination = _normalize_site_name(destination)
   _assert_site_exists(origin)
   _assert_site_exists(destination)
   allowed_waypoints = allowed_waypoints or []
   for w in allowed_waypoints:
       _assert_site_exists(_normalize_site_name(w))
   objective = (objective or "eta").strip().lower()
   if objective not in {"eta", "distance"}:
       raise ValueError("objective must be one of: 'eta', 'distance'")
   top_k = max(1, int(top_k))
   candidates = _all_paths_with_waypoints(origin, destination, allowed_waypoints, max_stops=max_stops)
   scored = []
   for path in candidates:
       metrics = compute_route_metrics(path, speed_kmph=speed_kmph, traffic_multiplier=traffic_multiplier)
       score = metrics["eta_minutes"] if objective == "eta" else metrics["distance_km"]
       scored.append((score, metrics))
   scored.sort(key=lambda x: x[0])
   best = scored[0][1]
   alternatives = [m for _, m in scored[1:top_k]]
   return {"best": best, "alternatives": alternatives, "objective": objective}

We introduce multi-stop routing logic by generating candidate paths with optional waypoints. We evaluate each candidate route against a clear optimization objective, such as ETA or distance. We then rank routes and extract the best option along with a set of strong alternatives.

@tool
def list_sites(site_type: Optional[str] = None) -> List[str]:
   if site_type:
       st = site_type.strip().lower()
       return sorted([k for k, v in SITES.items() if str(v.get("type", "")).lower() == st])
   return sorted(SITES.keys())


@tool
def get_site_details(site: str) -> Dict[str, Any]:
   s = _normalize_site_name(site)
   _assert_site_exists(s)
   return {"site": s, **SITES[s]}


@tool
def suggest_site(query: str, max_suggestions: int = 5) -> List[str]:
   q = (query or "").strip().lower()
   max_suggestions = max(1, int(max_suggestions))
   scored = []
   for name in SITES.keys():
       n = name.lower()
       common = len(set(q) & set(n))
       bonus = 5 if q and q in n else 0
       scored.append((common + bonus, name))
   scored.sort(key=lambda x: x[0], reverse=True)
   return [name for _, name in scored[:max_suggestions]]


@tool
def compute_direct_route(origin: str, destination: str, road_class: str = "arterial", traffic_multiplier: float = DEFAULT_TRAFFIC_MULTIPLIER) -> Dict[str, Any]:
   origin = _normalize_site_name(origin)
   destination = _normalize_site_name(destination)
   rc = (road_class or "arterial").strip().lower()
   if rc not in SPEED_PROFILES:
       raise ValueError(f"Unknown road_class '{road_class}'. Use one of: {sorted(SPEED_PROFILES.keys())}")
   speed = SPEED_PROFILES[rc]
   return compute_route_metrics([origin, destination], speed_kmph=speed, traffic_multiplier=float(traffic_multiplier))


@tool
def optimize_route(origin: str, destination: str, allowed_waypoints: Optional[List[str]] = None, max_stops: int = 2, road_class: str = "arterial", traffic_multiplier: float = DEFAULT_TRAFFIC_MULTIPLIER, objective: str = "eta", top_k: int = 3) -> Dict[str, Any]:
   origin = _normalize_site_name(origin)
   destination = _normalize_site_name(destination)
   rc = (road_class or "arterial").strip().lower()
   if rc not in SPEED_PROFILES:
       raise ValueError(f"Unknown road_class '{road_class}'. Use one of: {sorted(SPEED_PROFILES.keys())}")
   speed = SPEED_PROFILES[rc]
   allowed_waypoints = allowed_waypoints or []
   allowed_waypoints = [_normalize_site_name(w) for w in allowed_waypoints]
   return find_best_route(origin, destination, allowed_waypoints, int(max_stops), float(speed), float(traffic_multiplier), str(objective), int(top_k))

We expose the routing and discovery logic as callable tools for the agent. We allow the agent to list sites, inspect site details, resolve ambiguous names, and compute both direct and optimized routes. This tool layer ensures that the agent always reasons by calling verified functions rather than hallucinating results.

class RouteLeg(BaseModel):
   from_site: str
   to_site: str
   distance_km: float
   eta_minutes: float


class RoutePlan(BaseModel):
   route: List[str]
   distance_km: float
   eta_minutes: float
   legs: List[RouteLeg]
   objective: str


class RouteDecision(BaseModel):
   chosen: RoutePlan
   alternatives: List[RoutePlan] = []
   assumptions: Dict[str, Any] = {}
   notes: str = ""
   audit: List[str] = []


llm = ChatOpenAI(model="gpt-4o-mini", temperature=0.2)


SYSTEM_PROMPT = (
   "You are the Route Optimizer Agent for a logistics dispatch center.\n"
   "You MUST use tools for any distance/ETA calculation.\n"
   "Return ONLY the structured RouteDecision."
)


route_agent = create_agent(
   model=llm,
   tools=[list_sites, get_site_details, suggest_site, compute_direct_route, optimize_route],
   system_prompt=SYSTEM_PROMPT,
   response_format=RouteDecision,
)


def get_route_decision(origin: str, destination: str, road_class: str = "arterial", traffic_multiplier: float = DEFAULT_TRAFFIC_MULTIPLIER, allowed_waypoints: Optional[List[str]] = None, max_stops: int = 2, objective: str = "eta", top_k: int = 3) -> RouteDecision:
   user_msg = {
       "role": "user",
       "content": (
           f"Optimize the route from {origin} to {destination}.\n"
           f"road_class={road_class}, traffic_multiplier={traffic_multiplier}\n"
           f"objective={objective}, top_k={top_k}\n"
           f"allowed_waypoints={allowed_waypoints}, max_stops={max_stops}\n"
           "Return the structured RouteDecision only."
       ),
   }
   result = route_agent.invoke({"messages": [user_msg]})
   return result["structured_response"]


decision1 = get_route_decision("Yard_Main", "Rig_B", road_class="arterial", traffic_multiplier=1.12)
print(decision1.model_dump())


decision2 = get_route_decision("Rig_C", "Rig_B", road_class="highway", traffic_multiplier=1.08, allowed_waypoints=["Depot_1", "Depot_2", "Yard_Main"], max_stops=2, objective="eta", top_k=3)
print(decision2.model_dump())

We define strict Pydantic schemas to enforce structured, machine-readable outputs from the agent. We initialize the language model and create the agent with a clear system prompt and response format. We then demonstrate how to invoke the agent and obtain reliable route decisions ready for real logistics workflows.

In conclusion, we have implemented a robust, extensible route optimization agent that selects the best path between sites while clearly explaining its assumptions and alternatives. We demonstrated how combining deterministic routing logic with a tool-calling LLM produces reliable, auditable decisions suitable for real logistics operations. This foundation allows us to easily extend the system with live traffic data, fleet constraints, or cost-based objectives, making the agent a practical component in a larger dispatch or fleet-management platform.


Check out the Full Codes here. Also, feel free to follow us on Twitter and don’t forget to join our 100k+ ML SubReddit and Subscribe to our Newsletter. Wait! are you on telegram? now you can join us on telegram as well.


How to Design an Agentic Workflow for Tool-Driven Route Optimization with Deterministic Computation and Structured Outputs
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleNasa astronauts' moon mission delayed due to rocket issue
Next Article Every Model, Every Layer Is Risky
primereports
  • Website

Related Posts

Artificial Intelligence

An ode to craftsmanship in software development

March 4, 2026
Artificial Intelligence

The Greatest AI Show On Earth

February 25, 2026
Artificial Intelligence

Judge Dismisses Elon Musk’s XAI Trade Secret Lawsuit Against OpenAI

February 25, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

Global Resources Outlook 2024 | UNEP

December 6, 20255 Views

The D Brief: DHS shutdown likely; US troops leave al-Tanf; CNO’s plea to industry; Crowded robot-boat market; And a bit more.

February 14, 20264 Views

German Chancellor Merz faces difficult mission to Israel – DW – 12/06/2025

December 6, 20254 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • TikTok
  • WhatsApp
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Latest Reviews

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest tech news from FooBar about tech, design and biz.

PrimeReports.org
Independent global news, analysis & insights.

PrimeReports.org brings you in-depth coverage of geopolitics, markets, technology and risk – with context that helps you understand what really matters.

Editorially independent · Opinions are those of the authors and not investment advice.
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn YouTube
Key Sections
  • World
  • Geopolitics
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Popular Now
  • Cybersecurity
  • Crypto
All Categories
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Climate Risks
  • Crypto
  • Cybersecurity
  • Defense
  • Economy
  • Geopolitics
  • Global Markets
  • Healthcare Innovation
  • Politics
  • Popular Now
  • Science
  • Technology
  • World
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Disclaimer
  • Cookie Policy
  • DMCA / Copyright Notice
  • Editorial Policy

Sign up for Prime Reports Briefing – essential stories and analysis in your inbox.

By subscribing you agree to our Privacy Policy. You can opt out anytime.
Latest Stories
  • Calls for Global Digital Estate Standard as Fraud Risk Grows
  • An ode to craftsmanship in software development
  • Global economy must stop pandering to ‘frivolous desires of ultra-rich’, says UN expert | Environment
© 2026 PrimeReports.org. All rights reserved.
Privacy Terms Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.