LIVE NEWS
  • Meta’s New AI Agent Wants to Get Personal With You
  • How To Change And Customize Your Apple CarPlay Display
  • Hedge funder Brian Kelly built Bracket22 to be powered entirely by AI
  • Ukraine contracting around 1,000 Patriot missiles from allies, defense chief says
  • The New Race for Cross-Chain Liquidity: Why the Future of DeFi May Depend on Moving Capital Seamlessly
  • Threat actors are giving AI agents a bigger role in cyberattacks
  • NuScale Power Stock Broke Out in August. Is It a Buy?
  • Where on Earth is safest from global catastrophe?
Prime Reports
  • Home
  • Popular Now
  • Crypto
  • Cybersecurity
  • Economy
  • Geopolitics
  • Global Markets
  • Politics
  • See More
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Climate Risks
    • Defense
    • Healthcare Innovation
    • Science
    • Technology
    • World
Prime Reports
  • Home
  • Popular Now
  • Crypto
  • Cybersecurity
  • Economy
  • Geopolitics
  • Global Markets
  • Politics
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Climate Risks
  • Defense
  • Healthcare Innovation
  • Science
  • Technology
  • World
Home»Politics»Appeals court blocks Trump admin’s mandatory detention policy for illegal aliens
Politics

Appeals court blocks Trump admin’s mandatory detention policy for illegal aliens

primereportsBy primereportsJuly 31, 2026No Comments3 Mins Read
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
Appeals court blocks Trump admin’s mandatory detention policy for illegal aliens
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


Federal judge blocks Trump’s H-1B visa fee

A federal judge in Boston ruled against the Trump administration’s $100,000 fee for H-1B visas, deeming it an unauthorized tax. The fee, which was significantly increased from a typical $2,000-$5,000, aimed to prioritize US citizens in the workforce. The administration is appealing the decision.

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A federal appeals court on Thursday ruled that the Trump administration cannot deny migrants detained inside the U.S. a chance for release on bond as part of its expanded mandatory detention policy.

In a 2-1 decision, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco ruled against the administration.

Four other appeals courts have also rejected the policy, although the Fifth Circuit in New Orleans and Eighth Circuit in St. Louis have ruled in favor of the federal government.

The deepening circuit split raises the chance that the U.S. Supreme Court will eventually take up the case. The administration asked the high court last month to consider the case.

APPEALS COURT BLOCKS TRUMP ADMIN FROM HOLDING MIGRANTS WITHOUT BOND FOR 90 DAYS

Appeals court blocks Trump admin’s mandatory detention policy for illegal aliens

A federal appeals court ruled that the Trump administration cannot deny migrants detained inside the U.S. a chance for release on bond. (Jim WATSON / AFP via Getty Images)

The Department of Homeland Security said it “strongly disagrees with the Ninth Circuit panel and is confident in its legal position regarding mandatory detention.”

“President Donald Trump and Secretary Mullin are now enforcing the law as it was actually written to keep America safe,” the department said in a statement.

Under previous administrations, most illegal immigrants with no criminal record who were arrested inside the U.S. were allowed to seek a bond hearing while their immigration cases were pending, and mandatory detention was typically reserved for those detained at the border.

But last year, the government issued guidance expanding mandatory detention to include illegal immigrants inside the U.S. The move was part of the president’s mass deportation plan, leading to several lawsuits by immigrants pursuing a release from custody.

A U.S. Department Of Homeland Security and U.S. Customs and Border Protection sign is displayed at the U.S. Customs and Border Protection Headquarters on May 18, 2025 in Washington, DC.

The Department of Homeland Security said it “strongly disagrees with the Ninth Circuit panel and is confident in its legal position regarding mandatory detention.” (Kevin Carter/Getty Images)

Some federal judges who ordered bond hearings criticized the administration for repeatedly violating their orders.

The administration has said that Congress changed immigration law in 1996 to allow mandatory detention past the border and that previous administrations failed to enforce that measure.

But Ninth Circuit Judge Daniel Bress, who was appointed by President Donald Trump, rejected that argument.

“Although no reading of the complicated and interrelated textual provisions at issue here is without some shortcomings, the historical understanding of the statute is the better one,” said Bress, writing for the majority.

DEMOCRAT COMPARES ICE TO ‘DOMESTIC TERRORISTS’ AS 111 HOUSE DEMS DEMAND TEXAS DETENTION CENTER CLOSE

ICE agents outside Delaney Hall

Some federal judges who ordered bond hearings criticized the administration for repeatedly violating their orders. (Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Bress was joined by Judge M. Margaret McKeown, who was appointed by former President Bill Clinton.

Judge Carlos Bea, who was appointed by President George W. Bush, dissented, arguing that the amendment Congress passed 30 years ago supports the administration’s position.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleReview: Improve Identity Threat Detection and Response with Semperis Directory Services Protector
Next Article Oil crisis speeds up global transition to electric cars
primereports
  • Website

Related Posts

Politics

Labor Day: Union bosses continue to push forced dues over worker freedom

September 7, 2026
Politics

Data centers have Republicans and Democrats on the same page : NPR

September 6, 2026
Politics

Democrats and Republicans united in opposition to Flock surveillance cameras : NPR

September 6, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

Threat of further violence looms after Mexican cartel rampage

February 25, 2026116 Views

‘Two-sided risk’ Medicare Advantage plans improve patient outcomes

February 24, 202673 Views

An $18bn settlement – and Zuckerberg barely blinked. The tech titans must be stripped of their power, and soon | Jonathan Freedland

August 28, 202626 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • TikTok
  • WhatsApp
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Latest Reviews

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest tech news from FooBar about tech, design and biz.

PrimeReports.org
Independent global news, analysis & insights.

PrimeReports.org brings you in-depth coverage of geopolitics, markets, technology and risk – with context that helps you understand what really matters.

Editorially independent · Opinions are those of the authors and not investment advice.
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn YouTube
Key Sections
  • World
  • Crypto
  • Cybersecurity
  • Geopolitics
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Popular Now
All Categories
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Climate Risks
  • Crypto
  • Cybersecurity
  • Defense
  • Economy
  • Geopolitics
  • Global Markets
  • Healthcare Innovation
  • Politics
  • Popular Now
  • Science
  • Technology
  • World
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Disclaimer
  • Cookie Policy
  • DMCA / Copyright Notice
  • Editorial Policy

Sign up for Prime Reports Briefing – essential stories and analysis in your inbox.

By subscribing you agree to our Privacy Policy. You can opt out anytime.
Latest Stories
  • Meta’s New AI Agent Wants to Get Personal With You
  • How To Change And Customize Your Apple CarPlay Display
  • Hedge funder Brian Kelly built Bracket22 to be powered entirely by AI
© 2026 PrimeReports.org. All rights reserved.
Privacy Terms Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.