Minx, J. C. et al. A comprehensive and synthetic dataset for global, regional, and national greenhouse gas emissions by sector 1970–2018 with an extension to 2019. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 13, 5213–5252 (2021).
Lamb, W. F. et al. A review of trends and drivers of greenhouse gas emissions by sector from 1990 to 2018. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 073005 (2021).
Höhne, N. et al. Emissions: world has four times the work or one-third of the time. Nature 579, 25–28 (2020).
Eskander, S., Fankhauser, S. & Setzer, J. Global lessons from climate change legislation and litigation. Environ. Energy Policy Econ. 2, 44–82 (2021).
Rogelj, J. et al. Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C. Nature 534, 631–639 (2016).
Roelfsema, M. et al. Taking stock of national climate policies to evaluate implementation of the Paris Agreement. Nat. Commun. 11, 2096 (2020).
Aldy, J. et al. Economic tools to promote transparency and comparability in the Paris Agreement. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 1000–1004 (2016).
Stechemesser, A. et al. Climate policies that achieved major emission reductions: global evidence from two decades. Science 385, 884–892 (2024).
Bechtel, M. M., Scheve, K. F. & van Lieshout, E. Constant carbon pricing increases support for climate action compared to ramping up costs over time. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 1004–1009 (2020).
State and Trends of Carbon Pricing Dashboard (World Bank, 2023); https://carbonpricingdashboard.worldbank.org/compliance/instrument-detail
Cherry, C., Scott, K., Barrett, J. & Pidgeon, N. Public acceptance of resource-efficiency strategies to mitigate climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 1007–1012 (2018).
Eskander, S. M. S. U. & Fankhauser, S. Reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from national climate legislation. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 750–756 (2020).
Zhang, W.-W. et al. Co-benefits of regionally-differentiated carbon pricing policies across China. Clim. Policy 24, 57–70 (2024).
Kruse-Andersen, P. K. & Sørensen, P. B. Optimal carbon taxation in EU frontrunner countries: coordinating with the EU ETS and addressing leakage. Clim. Policy 24, 26–38 (2024).
IPCC Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Shukla, P. R. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022).
Anke, C.-P., Hobbie, H., Schreiber, S. & Möst, D. Coal phase-outs and carbon prices: interactions between EU emission trading and national carbon mitigation policies. Energy Policy 144, 111647 (2020).
Blyth, W., Bunn, D., Kettunen, J. & Wilson, T. Policy interactions, risk and price formation in carbon markets. Energy Policy 37, 5192–5207 (2009).
van den Bergh, J. et al. Designing an effective climate-policy mix: accounting for instrument synergy. Clim. Policy 21, 745–764 (2021).
Schäfer, S. Decoupling the EU ETS from subsidized renewables and other demand side effects: lessons from the impact of the EU ETS on CO2 emissions in the German electricity sector. Energy Policy 133, 110858 (2019).
Rosenbloom, D., Markard, J., Geels, F. W. & Fuenfschilling, L. Why carbon pricing is not sufficient to mitigate climate change—and how ‘sustainability transition policy’ can help. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 8664–8668 (2020).
Sitarz, J., Pahle, M., Osorio, S., Luderer, G. & Pietzcker, R. EU carbon prices signal high policy credibility and farsighted actors. Nat. Energy 9, 691–702 (2024).
Döbbeling-Hildebrandt, N. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of ex-post evaluations on the effectiveness of carbon pricing. Nat. Commun. 15, 4147 (2024).
Schmidt, T. S. & Sewerin, S. Measuring the temporal dynamics of policy mixes—an empirical analysis of renewable energy policy mixes’ balance and design features in nine countries. Res. Policy 48, 103557 (2019).
Fischer, C., Preonas, L. & Newell, R. G. Environmental and technology policy options in the electricity sector: are we deploying too many? J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 4, 959–984 (2017).
Bouma, J. A., Verbraak, M., Dietz, F. & Brouwer, R. Policy mix: mess or merit? J. Environ. Econ. Policy 8, 32–47 (2019).
Cheng, Y., Sinha, A., Ghosh, V., Sengupta, T. & Luo, H. Carbon tax and energy innovation at crossroads of carbon neutrality: designing a sustainable decarbonization policy. J. Environ. Manage. 294, 112957 (2021).
Kivimaa, P. & Kern, F. Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions. Res. Policy 45, 205–217 (2016).
Kwon, T. Policy synergy or conflict for renewable energy support: case of RPS and auction in South Korea. Energy Policy 123, 443–449 (2018).
Liu, Y. CDM and national policy: synergy or conflict? Evidence from the wind power sector in China. Clim. Policy https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2014.968764 (2015).
Harrison, P. A., Dunford, R. W., Holman, I. P. & Rounsevell, M. D. A. Climate change impact modelling needs to include cross-sectoral interactions. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 885–890 (2016).
Allcott, H., Knittel, C. & Taubinsky, D. Tagging and targeting of energy efficiency subsidies. Am. Econ. Rev. 105, 187–191 (2015).
Fischer, C. Renewable portfolio standards: when do they lower energy prices? Energy J. 31, 101–120 (2010).
Fischer, C. & Newell, R. G. Environmental and technology policies for climate mitigation. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 55, 142–162 (2008).
Fischer, C., Parry, I. W. H. & Pizer, W. A. Instrument choice for environmental protection when technological innovation is endogenous. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 45, 523–545 (2003).
Stiglitz, J. E. Addressing climate change through price and non-price interventions. Eur. Econ. Rev. 119, 594–612 (2019).
Mengesha, I. & Roy, D. Carbon pricing drives critical transition to green growth. Nat. Commun. 16, 1321 (2025).
Liu, Y. et al. Mitigation policies interactions delay the achievement of carbon neutrality in China. Nat. Clim. Change 15, 147–152 (2025).
Liu, L.-J. et al. Carbon emissions and economic impacts of an EU embargo on Russian fossil fuels. Nat. Clim. Change 13, 290–296 (2023).
Skovgaard, J., Ferrari, S. S. & Knaggård, Å Mapping and clustering the adoption of carbon pricing policies: what polities price carbon and why? Clim. Policy 19, 1173–1185 (2019).
Matthews, H. D. & Wynes, S. Current global efforts are insufficient to limit warming to 1.5 °C. Science 376, 1404–1409 (2022).
Fankhauser, S. et al. The meaning of net zero and how to get it right. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 15–21 (2022).
Hoppe, J., Hinder, B., Rafaty, R., Patt, A. & Grubb, M. Three decades of climate mitigation policy: what has it delivered? Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 48, 615–650 (2023).
Dolphin, G. & Xiahou, Q. World carbon pricing database: sources and methods. Sci. Data 9, 573 (2022).
Wu, L., Huang, Z., Zhang, X. & Wang, Y. Harmonizing existing climate change mitigation policy datasets with a hybrid machine learning approach. Sci. Data 11, 580 (2024).
Stefan, O. A. et al. EU soft law in the EU legal order: a literature review. SSRN https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3346629 (2019).
Abbott, K. W. & Snidal, D. Hard and soft law in international governance. Int. Organ. 54, 421–456 (2000).
Weitzman, M. L. Prices vs. quantities. Rev. Econ. Stud. 41, 477–491 (1974).
Montgomery, W. D. Markets in licenses and efficient pollution control programs. J. Econ. Theory 5, 395–418 (1972).
Böhringer, C. & Rosendahl, K. E. Green promotes the dirtiest: on the interaction between black and green quotas in energy markets. J. Regul. Econ. 37, 316–325 (2010).
Popp, D. R&D subsidies and climate policy: is there a ‘free lunch’? Climatic Change 77, 311–341 (2006).
Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., Bursztyn, L. & Hemous, D. The environment and directed technical change. Am. Econ. Rev. 102, 131–166 (2012).
Schoubben, F. in Regulations in the Energy Industry (eds. Dorsman, A. et al.) 7–31 (Springer International, 2020); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32296-0_2
Schmalensee, R. & Stavins, R. N. The design of environmental markets: what have we learned from experience with cap and trade? Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 33, 572–588 (2017).
Zhang, D. et al. Integrity of firms’ emissions reporting in China’s early carbon markets. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 164–169 (2019).
Pan, Y. et al. Game analysis of carbon emission verification: a case study from Shenzhen’s cap-and-trade system in China. Energy Policy 130, 418–428 (2019).
Spiegel-Feld, D. Emissions trading for buildings? SSRN https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3443185 (2019).
Woo, J. et al. Applying blockchain technology for building energy performance measurement, reporting, and verification (MRV) and the carbon credit market: a review of the literature. Build. Environ. 205, 108199 (2021).
Goulder, L. H. & Parry, I. W. H. Instrument choice in environmental policy. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 2, 152–174 (2008).
Twomey, P. Rationales for additional climate policy instruments under a carbon price. Econ. Labour Relat. Rev. 23, 7–30 (2012).
Fagiani, R., Richstein, J. C., Hakvoort, R. & De Vries, L. The dynamic impact of carbon reduction and renewable support policies on the electricity sector. Util. Policy 28, 28–41 (2014).
Meckling, J., Sterner, T. & Wagner, G. Policy sequencing toward decarbonization. Nat. Energy 2, 918–922 (2017).
Linsenmeier, M., Mohommad, A. & Schwerhoff, G. Policy sequencing towards carbon pricing among the world’s largest emitters. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 1107–1110 (2022).
Pahle, M. et al. Sequencing to ratchet up climate policy stringency. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 861–867 (2018).
Grajek, M. & Röller, L.-H. Regulation and investment in network industries: evidence from European telecoms. J. Law Econ. 55, 189–216 (2012).
Wang, M. & Kuusi, T. Trade flows, carbon leakage, and the EU emissions trading system. Energy Econ. 134, 107556 (2024).
IPCC Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report (eds Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R. K. & Meyer, L. A.) (IPCC, 2014).
Fankhauser, S., Gennaioli, C. & Collins, M. The political economy of passing climate change legislation: evidence from a survey. Glob. Environ. Change 35, 52–61 (2015).
Chen, P. et al. The heterogeneous role of energy policies in the energy transition of Asia–Pacific emerging economies. Nat. Energy 7, 588–596 (2022).
Huang, C., Yang, C. & Su, J. Policy change analysis based on ‘policy target–policy instrument’ patterns: a case study of China’s nuclear energy policy. Scientometrics 117, 1081–1114 (2018).
Schaffrin, A., Sewerin, S. & Seubert, S. Toward a comparative measure of climate policy output. Policy Stud. J. 43, 257–282 (2015).
Dong, X., Wang, C., Zhang, F., Zhang, H. & Xia, C. China’s low-carbon policy intensity dataset from national- to prefecture-level over 2007–2022. Sci. Data 11, 213 (2024).
Ma, Y.-R. et al. A news-based climate policy uncertainty index for China. Sci. Data 10, 881 (2023).
Dagnachew, A. G., Lucas, P. L., Hof, A. F. & van Vuuren, D. P. Trade-offs and synergies between universal electricity access and climate change mitigation in sub-Saharan Africa. Energy Policy 114, 355–366 (2018).
Rasul, G. & Sharma, B. The nexus approach to water–energy–food security: an option for adaptation to climate change. Clim. Policy 16, 682–702 (2016).
Fuso Nerini, F. et al. Mapping synergies and trade-offs between energy and the sustainable development goals. Nat. Energy 3, 10–15 (2018).
Berry, P. M. et al. Cross-sectoral interactions of adaptation and mitigation measures. Climatic Change 128, 381–393 (2015).
Hasan, M. A. et al. The synergy between climate change policies and national development goals: implications for sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 249, 119369 (2020).
Persha, L., Agrawal, A. & Chhatre, A. Social and ecological synergy: local rulemaking, forest livelihoods, and biodiversity conservation. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1199343 (2011).
Duan, M., Tian, Z., Zhao, Y. & Li, M. Interactions and coordination between carbon emissions trading and other direct carbon mitigation policies in China. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 33, 59–69 (2017).
Jacobsson, S., Bergek, A. & Sandén, B. Improving the European Commission’s analytical base for designing instrument mixes in the energy sector: market failures versus system weaknesses. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 33, 11–20 (2017).
Bryan, B. A. et al. Designer policy for carbon and biodiversity co-benefits under global change. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 301–305 (2016).
Gao, C. et al. Analysis of passenger vehicle pollutant emission factor based on on-board measurement. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 13, 101421 (2022).
Abadie, A. & Gardeazabal, J. The economic costs of conflict: a case study of the Basque country. Am. Econ. Rev. 93, 113–132 (2003).
Abadie, A., Diamond, A. & Hainmueller, J. Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: estimating the effect of California’s tobacco control program. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 105, 493–505 (2010).
Wu, Liu, G., Huang, Z., Meng, J., & Zhou, Y. Lily-LGL/climate_policy_interaction: (v1.0.0). Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18015601 (2025).
