LIVE NEWS
  • Calls for Global Digital Estate Standard as Fraud Risk Grows
  • An ode to craftsmanship in software development
  • Global economy must stop pandering to ‘frivolous desires of ultra-rich’, says UN expert | Environment
  • Some Middle East Flights Resume but Confusion Reigns From Iran Strikes
  • Clinton Deposition Videos Released in Epstein Investigation
  • Elevance stock tumbles as CMS may halt Medicare enrollment
  • Wild spaces for butterflies to be created in Glasgow
  • You can now adjust how your caller card looks for calls on Android phones
Prime Reports
  • Home
  • Popular Now
  • Crypto
  • Cybersecurity
  • Economy
  • Geopolitics
  • Global Markets
  • Politics
  • See More
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Climate Risks
    • Defense
    • Healthcare Innovation
    • Science
    • Technology
    • World
Prime Reports
  • Home
  • Popular Now
  • Crypto
  • Cybersecurity
  • Economy
  • Geopolitics
  • Global Markets
  • Politics
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Climate Risks
  • Defense
  • Healthcare Innovation
  • Science
  • Technology
  • World
Home»World»From short-term uncertainties to long-term certainties in the future evolution of the Antarctic Ice Sheet
World

From short-term uncertainties to long-term certainties in the future evolution of the Antarctic Ice Sheet

primereportsBy primereportsDecember 6, 2025No Comments16 Mins Read
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
From short-term uncertainties to long-term certainties in the future evolution of the Antarctic Ice Sheet
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


  • Otosaka, I. N. et al. Mass balance of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets from 1992 to 2020. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 15, 1597–1616 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Milillo, P. et al. Rapid glacier retreat rates observed in West Antarctica. Nat. Geosci. 15, 48–53 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Miles, B. W. J., Stokes, C. R., Vieli, A. & Cox, N. J. Rapid, climate-driven changes in outlet glaciers on the Pacific coast of East Antarctica. Nature 500, 563–566 (2013).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, X., Rignot, E., Mouginot, J. & Scheuchl, B. Ice flow dynamics and mass loss of Totten Glacier, East Antarctica, from 1989 to 2015. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 6366–6373 (2016).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, D. et al. Framing, context, and methods. In: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M.I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T.K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, 147–286 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.003 (2021).

  • Fox-Kemper, B. et al. Ocean, cryosphere and sea level change. In: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M.I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T.K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, 1211–1362 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.011 (2021).

  • DeConto, R. M. et al. The Paris Climate Agreement and future sea-level rise from Antarctica. Nature 593, 83–89 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bamber, J. L., Oppenheimer, M., Kopp, R. E., Aspinall, W. P. & Cooke, R. M. Ice sheet contributions to future sea-level rise from structured expert judgment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 116, 11195–11200 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Reese, R. et al. The stability of present-day Antarctic grounding lines – Part 2: onset of irreversible retreat of Amundsen Sea glaciers under current climate on centennial timescales cannot be excluded. Cryosphere 17, 3761–3783 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Coulon, V. et al. Disentangling the drivers of future Antarctic ice loss with a historically calibrated ice-sheet model. Cryosphere 18, 653–681 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Golledge, N. R. et al. The multi-millennial Antarctic commitment to future sea-level rise. Nature 526, 421–425 (2015).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Klose, A. K., Coulon, V., Pattyn, F. & Winkelmann, R. The long-term sea-level commitment from Antarctica. Cryosphere 18, 4463–4492 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Oppenheimer, M. et al. Sea level rise and implications for low-lying islands, coasts and communities. In: IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate [H.-O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, M. Tignor, E. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, M. Nicolai, A. Okem, J. Petzold, B. Rama, N.M. Weyer (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, 321–445 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157964.006 (2019).

  • DeConto, R. M. & Pollard, D. Contribution of Antarctica to past and future sea-level rise. Nature 531, 591–597 (2016).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bulthuis, K., Arnst, M., Sun, S. & Pattyn, F. Uncertainty quantification of the multi-centennial response of the Antarctic ice sheet to climate change. Cryosphere 13, 1349–1380 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Seroussi, H. et al. ISMIP6 Antarctica: a multi-model ensemble of the Antarctic ice sheet evolution over the 21st century. Cryosphere 14, 3033–3070 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Edwards, T. L. et al. Projected land ice contributions to twenty-first-century sea level rise. Nature 593, 74–82 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Levermann, A. et al. Projecting Antarctica’s contribution to future sea level rise from basal ice shelf melt using linear response functions of 16 ice sheet models (LARMIP-2). Earth Syst. Dyn. 11, 35–76 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Seroussi, H. et al. Evolution of the Antarctic Ice Sheet over the next three centuries from an ISMIP6 model ensemble. Earth’s Future 12, 2024–004561 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Aschwanden, A., Bartholomaus, T. C., Brinkerhoff, D. J. & Truffer, M. Brief communication: a roadmap towards credible projections of ice sheet contribution to sea level. Cryosphere 15, 5705–5715 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nias, I. J., Cornford, S. L., Edwards, T. L., Gourmelen, N. & Payne, A. J. Assessing uncertainty in the dynamical ice response to ocean warming in the Amundsen Sea Embayment, West Antarctica. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 11253–11260 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Reese, R., Levermann, A., Albrecht, T., Seroussi, H. & Winkelmann, R. The role of history and strength of the oceanic forcing in sea level projections from Antarctica with the Parallel Ice Sheet Model. Cryosphere 14, 3097–3110 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Golledge, N. R. et al. Global environmental consequences of twenty-first-century ice-sheet melt. Nature 566, 65–72 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lowry, D. P., Krapp, M., Golledge, N. R. & Alevropoulos-Borrill, A. The influence of emissions scenarios on future Antarctic ice loss is unlikely to emerge this century. Commun. Earth Environ. 2, 221 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ritz, C. et al. Potential sea-level rise from Antarctic ice-sheet instability constrained by observations. Nature 528, 115–118 (2015).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Turner, F. E. et al. Illustrative multi-centennial projections of global mean sea-level rise and their application. Earth’s Future 11, 2023–003550 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Stokes, C. R. et al. Response of the East Antarctic Ice Sheet to past and future climate change. Nature 608, 275–286 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Palmer, M. D. & Weeks, J. H. The need for multi-century projections of sea level rise. Earth’s Future 12, 2023–004403 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Meinshausen, M. et al. The shared socio-economic pathway (SSP) greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions to 2500. Geosci. Model. Dev. 13, 3571–3605 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sellar, A. A. et al. UKESM1: Description and evaluation of the UK Earth System Model. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 11, 4513–4558 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Boucher, O. et al. Presentation and evaluation of the IPSL-CM6A-LR climate model. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 12, 2019–002010 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Danabasoglu, G. et al. The community earth system model version 2 (CESM2). J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 12, 2019–001916 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yukimoto, S. et al. The Meteorological Research Institute Earth System Model version 2.0, MRI-ESM2. 0: description and basic evaluation of the physical component. J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn. Ser. II 97, 931–965 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • O’Neill, B. C. et al. The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6. Geosci. Model. Dev. 9, 3461–3482 (2016).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Meehl, G. A. et al. Context for interpreting equilibrium climate sensitivity and transient climate response from the CMIP6 Earth system models. Sci. Adv. 6, 1981 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Beadling, R. L. et al. Representation of Southern Ocean properties across coupled model intercomparison project generations: CMIP3 to CMIP6. J. Clim. 33, 6555–6581 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bracegirdle, T. et al. Improvements in circumpolar Southern Hemisphere Extratropical Atmospheric Circulation in CMIP6 compared to CMIP5. Earth Space Sci. 7, 2019–001065 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Purich, A. & England, M. H. Historical and future projected warming of antarctic shelf bottom water in CMIP6 models. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48, 2021–092752 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pattyn, F. Sea-level response to melting of Antarctic ice shelves on multi-centennial timescales with the fast elementary thermomechanical ice sheet model (f.ETISh v1.0). Cryosphere 11, 1851–1878 (2017).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bueler, E. & Brown, J. Shallow shelf approximation as a “sliding law” in a thermomechanically coupled ice sheet model. J. Geophys. Res.: Earth Surf. 114, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JF001179 (2009).

  • Winkelmann, R. et al. The Potsdam Parallel Ice Sheet Model (PISM-PIK) – Part 1: model description. Cryosphere 5, 715–726 (2011).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Santner, T. J., Williams, B. J., Notz, W. I. & Williams, B. J. The design and analysis of computer experiments. Springer, New York (2003).

  • Nias, I. J., Cornford, S. L. & Payne, A. J. Contrasting the modelled sensitivity of the Amundsen Sea Embayment ice streams. J. Glaciol. 62, 552–562 (2016).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jenkins, A. A one-dimensional model of ice shelf-ocean interaction. J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans 96, 20671–20677 (1991).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Payne, A. J. et al. Numerical modeling of ocean-ice interactions under Pine Island Bay’s ice shelf. J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans 112, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JC003733 (2017).

  • Li, D., DeConto, R. M. & Pollard, D. Climate model differences contribute deep uncertainty in future Antarctic ice loss. Sci. Adv. 9, 7082 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Seroussi, H. et al. Insights into the vulnerability of Antarctic glaciers from the ISMIP6 ice sheet model ensemble and associated uncertainty. Cryosphere 17, 5197–5217 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Reese, R., Albrecht, T., Mengel, M., Asay-Davis, X. & Winkelmann, R. Antarctic sub-shelf melt rates via PICO. Cryosphere 12, 1969–1985 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Seroussi, H. et al. initMIP-Antarctica: an ice sheet model initialization experiment of ISMIP6. Cryosphere 13, 1441–1471 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gardner, A. S. et al. Increased West Antarctic and unchanged East Antarctic ice discharge over the last 7 years. Cryosphere 12, 521–547 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Morlighem, M. et al. Deep glacial troughs and stabilizing ridges unveiled beneath the margins of the Antarctic ice sheet. Nat. Geosci. 13, 132–137 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pan, L. et al. Rapid postglacial rebound amplifies global sea level rise following West Antarctic Ice Sheet collapse. Sci. Adv. 7, 7787 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Le Cozannet, G. et al. Adaptation to multi-meter sea-level rise should start now. Environ. Res. Lett. 18, 091001 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Slangen, A. B. A., Haasnoot, M. & Winter, G. Rethinking sea-level projections using families and timing differences. Earth’s Future 10, 2021–002576 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lhermitte, S. et al. Damage accelerates ice shelf instability and mass loss in Amundsen Sea Embayment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 117, 24735–24741 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Trusel, L. D. et al. Divergent trajectories of Antarctic surface melt under two twenty-first-century climate scenarios. Nat. Geosci. 8, 927–932 (2015).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lai, C.-Y. et al. Vulnerability of Antarctica’s ice shelves to meltwater-driven fracture. Nature 584, 574–578 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bassis, J. N. & Walker, C. C. Upper and lower limits on the stability of calving glaciers from the yield strength envelope of ice. Proc. R. Soc. A: Math., Phys. Eng. Sci. 468, 913–931 (2012).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pollard, D., DeConto, R. M. & Alley, R. B. Potential Antarctic Ice Sheet retreat driven by hydrofracturing and ice cliff failure. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 412, 112–121 (2015).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Morlighem, M. et al. The West Antarctic Ice Sheet may not be vulnerable to marine ice cliff instability during the 21st century. Sci. Adv. 10, 7794 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Coulon, V. et al. Contrasting response of west and east antarctic ice sheets to glacial isostatic adjustment. J. Geophys. Res.: Earth Surf. 126, 2020–006003 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Gomez, N. et al. The influence of realistic 3D mantle viscosity on Antarctica’s contribution to future global sea levels. Sci. Adv. 10, 1470 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Brondex, J., Gillet-Chaulet, F. & Gagliardini, O. Sensitivity of centennial mass loss projections of the Amundsen basin to the friction law. Cryosphere 13, 177–195 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kazmierczak, E., Sun, S., Coulon, V. & Pattyn, F. Subglacial hydrology modulates basal sliding response of the Antarctic ice sheet to climate forcing. Cryosphere 16, 4537–4552 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhao, C. et al. Subglacial water amplifies Antarctic contributions to sea-level rise. Nat. Commun. 16, 3187 (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lee, J.-Y. et al. Future global climate: scenario-based projections and near-term information. In: Climate Change 2021: the physical science basis. contribution of working group i to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.006. Cambridge University Press, 553–672 (2021).

  • Schoof, C. Ice sheet grounding line dynamics: steady states, stability, and hysteresis. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surface 112, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JF000664 (2007).

  • Pollard, D. & DeConto, R. M. Description of a hybrid ice sheet-shelf model, and application to Antarctica. Geosci. Model Dev. 5, 1273–1295 (2012).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pollard, D. & DeConto, R. M. Improvements in one-dimensional grounding-line parameterizations in an ice-sheet model with lateral variations (PSUICE3D v2.1). Geosci. Model Dev. 13, 6481–6500 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pollard, D. & DeConto, R. M. A simple inverse method for the distribution of basal sliding coefficients under ice sheets, applied to Antarctica. Cryosphere 6, 953–971 (2012).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lazeroms, W. M. J., Jenkins, A., Rienstra, S. W. & Wal, R. S. W. An analytical derivation of ice-shelf basal melt based on the dynamics of meltwater plumes. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 49, 917–939 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Favier, L. et al. Assessment of sub-shelf melting parameterisations using the ocean-ice-sheet coupled model NEMO(v3.6)-Elmer/Ice(v8.3). Geosci. Model Dev. 12, 2255–2283 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jourdain, N. C. et al. A protocol for calculating basal melt rates in the ISMIP6 Antarctic ice sheet projections. Cryosphere 14, 3111–3134 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Le Meur, E. & Huybrechts, P. A comparison of different ways of dealing with isostasy: examples from modelling the Antarctic ice sheet during the last glacial cycle. Ann. Glaciol. 23, 309–317 (1996).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bernales, J., Rogozhina, I. & Thomas, M. Melting and freezing under Antarctic ice shelves from a combination of ice-sheet modelling and observations. J. Glaciol. 63, 731–744 (2017).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Garbe, J., Albrecht, T., Levermann, A., Donges, J. F. & Winkelmann, R. The hysteresis of the Antarctic Ice Sheet. Nature 585, 538–544 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Feldmann, J., Albrecht, T., Khroulev, C., Pattyn, F. & Levermann, A. Resolution-dependent performance of grounding line motion in a shallow model compared with a full-Stokes model according to the MISMIP3d intercomparison. J. Glaciol. 60, 353–360 (2014).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Martin, M. A. et al. The Potsdam Parallel Ice Sheet Model (PISM-PIK) – Part 2: dynamic equilibrium simulation of the Antarctic ice sheet. Cryosphere 5, 727–740 (2011).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schmidtko, S., Heywood, K. J., Thompson, A. F. & Aoki, S. Multidecadal warming of Antarctic waters. Science 346, 1227–1231 (2014).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Levermann, A. et al. Kinematic first-order calving law implies potential for abrupt ice-shelf retreat. Cryosphere 6, 273–286 (2012).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Albrecht, T., Winkelmann, R. & Levermann, A. Glacial-cycle simulations of the Antarctic Ice sheet with the Parallel Ice Sheet Model (PISM) – part 1: boundary conditions and climatic forcing. Cryosphere 14, 599–632 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lingle, C. S. & Clark, J. A. A numerical model of interactions between a marine ice sheet and the solid earth: Application to a West Antarctic ice stream. J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans 90, 1100–1114 (1985).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bueler, E., Lingle, C. S. & Brown, J. Fast computation of a viscoelastic deformable Earth model for ice-sheet simulations. Ann. Glaciol. 46, 97–105 (2007).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fretwell, P. et al. Bedmap2: improved ice bed, surface and thickness datasets for Antarctica. Cryosphere 7, 375–393 (2013).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rignot, E., Mouginot, J. & Scheuchl, B. Ice flow of the Antarctic Ice sheet. Science 333, 1427–1430 (2011).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Goelzer, H., Coulon, V., Pattyn, F., Boer, B. & Wal, R. Brief communication: on calculating the sea-level contribution in marine ice-sheet models. Cryosphere 14, 833–840 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kittel, C. et al. Diverging future surface mass balance between the Antarctic ice shelves and grounded ice sheet. Cryosphere 15, 1215–1236 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wessem, J. M. et al. Modelling the climate and surface mass balance of polar ice sheets using RACMO2 – Part 2: Antarctica (1979-2016). Cryosphere 12, 1479–1498 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Goosse, H. et al. Reconstructing surface temperature changes over the past 600 years using climate model simulations with data assimilation. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 115, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012737 (2010).

  • Kreuzer, M. et al. Coupling framework (1.0) for the PISM (1.1.4) ice sheet model and the MOM5 (5.1.0) ocean model via the PICO ice shelf cavity model in an Antarctic domain. Geosci. Model Dev. 14, 3697–3714 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bentsen, M. et al. The Norwegian earth system model, NorESM1-M – Part 1: description and basic evaluation of the physical climate. Geosci. Model Dev. 6, 687–720 (2013).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Barthel, A. et al. CMIP5 model selection for ISMIP6 ice sheet model forcing: Greenland and Antarctica. Cryosphere 14, 855–879 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lazeroms, W. M. J., Jenkins, A., Gudmundsson, G. H. & Wal, R. S. W. Modelling present-day basal melt rates for Antarctic ice shelves using a parametrization of buoyant meltwater plumes. Cryosphere 12, 49–70 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Asay-Davis, X. S., Jourdain, N. C. & Nakayama, Y. Developments in simulating and parameterizing interactions between the Southern Ocean and the Antarctic ice sheet. Curr. Clim. Change Rep. 3, 316–329 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Reeh, N. Parameterization of melt rate and surface temperature on the greenland ice sheet. Polarforschung 59, 113–128 (1991).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Calov, R. & Greve, R. A semi-analytical solution for the positive degree-day model with stochastic temperature variations. J. Glaciol. 51, 173–175 (2005).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Edwards, T. L. et al. Revisiting Antarctic ice loss due to marine ice-cliff instability. Nature 566, 58–64 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nias, I. J., Nowicki, S., Felikson, D. & Loomis, B. Modeling the Greenland Ice sheet’s committed contribution to sea level during the 21st century. J. Geophys. Res.: Earth Surf. 128, 2022–006914 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Jager, E. et al. The future of Upernavik Isstrøm through the ISMIP6 framework: sensitivity analysis and Bayesian calibration of ensemble prediction. Cryosphere 18, 5519–5550 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Girden, E. R. ANOVA. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983419 (1992).

  • Coulon, V. et al. Data and code for publication “From short-term uncertainties to long-term certainties in the future evolution of the Antarctic Ice Sheet”. Zenodo [code and data set] https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17432520. (2025).

  • Good, P. et al. MOHC UKESM1.0-LL model output prepared for CMIP6 ScenarioMIP. Earth System Grid Federation https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.1567 (2019).

  • Boucher, O. et al. IPSL IPSL-CM6A-LR model output prepared for CMIP6 ScenarioMIP. Earth System Grid Federation https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.1532 (2019).

  • Danabasoglu, G. NCAR CESM2-WACCM model output prepared for CMIP6 ScenarioMIP. Earth System Grid Federation https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.10026 (2019).

  • Yukimoto, S. et al. MRI MRI-ESM2.0 model output prepared for CMIP6 ScenarioMIP. Earth System Grid Federation https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.638 (2019).

  • Burgard, C. et al. An assessment of basal melt parameterisations for Antarctic ice shelves. Cryosphere 16, 4931–4975 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleYour tax refund could be $1,000 bigger next year — and even more if you make these money moves in time
    Next Article With Trainium4, AWS Will Crank Up Everything But The Clocks
    primereports
    • Website

    Related Posts

    World

    Global economy must stop pandering to ‘frivolous desires of ultra-rich’, says UN expert | Environment

    March 4, 2026
    World

    Grasslands and Wetlands Are Being Gobbled Up By Agriculture, Mostly Livestock

    February 25, 2026
    World

    Cropped 25 February 2026: Food inflation strikes | El Niño looms | Biodiversity talks stagnate

    February 25, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Global Resources Outlook 2024 | UNEP

    December 6, 20255 Views

    The D Brief: DHS shutdown likely; US troops leave al-Tanf; CNO’s plea to industry; Crowded robot-boat market; And a bit more.

    February 14, 20264 Views

    German Chancellor Merz faces difficult mission to Israel – DW – 12/06/2025

    December 6, 20254 Views
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    Latest Reviews

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest tech news from FooBar about tech, design and biz.

    PrimeReports.org
    Independent global news, analysis & insights.

    PrimeReports.org brings you in-depth coverage of geopolitics, markets, technology and risk – with context that helps you understand what really matters.

    Editorially independent · Opinions are those of the authors and not investment advice.
    Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn YouTube
    Key Sections
    • World
    • Geopolitics
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Popular Now
    • Cybersecurity
    • Crypto
    All Categories
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Climate Risks
    • Crypto
    • Cybersecurity
    • Defense
    • Economy
    • Geopolitics
    • Global Markets
    • Healthcare Innovation
    • Politics
    • Popular Now
    • Science
    • Technology
    • World
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Disclaimer
    • Cookie Policy
    • DMCA / Copyright Notice
    • Editorial Policy

    Sign up for Prime Reports Briefing – essential stories and analysis in your inbox.

    By subscribing you agree to our Privacy Policy. You can opt out anytime.
    Latest Stories
    • Calls for Global Digital Estate Standard as Fraud Risk Grows
    • An ode to craftsmanship in software development
    • Global economy must stop pandering to ‘frivolous desires of ultra-rich’, says UN expert | Environment
    © 2026 PrimeReports.org. All rights reserved.
    Privacy Terms Contact

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.