When you’re picking components for a build, it’s easy to get hung up on “must-have” features that you think you can never do without. I’ve been in the same boat before, endlessly debating the merits of CPU cores and GPU VRAM against value for money and practical considerations. In 2026, I’ve decided not to chain myself to a handful of specs that keep delaying the research phase without benefiting it in any way. Going forward, I’ll focus on performance rather than specs, and features rather than looks, when choosing components for a new build. This way, I can also save myself a significant portion of my budget that would otherwise be wasted on vanity metrics and “future-proof” specs.
7 worst purchase decisions to avoid when building a gaming PC
Some mistakes are minor, but these PC building purchase decisions are anything but
Motherboard design
I’ve grown out of it
Ever since I got my first job, I have had extra money to spend on a PC, and esthetics became a core consideration. The motherboard isn’t the most visible component inside a PC, but I still wanted a model that looked eye-catching behind the CPU cooler, graphics card, and RAM. I just couldn’t let go of the overall theme I had in mind for my builds, whether it was all-white or a dual-tone esthetic. Naturally, this inflated my PC budget more than once as I splurged on a white motherboard or one with overbuilt VRMs. Years later, I’ve realized that the PCB and accents on a motherboard don’t matter for a good-looking PC as much as I thought. And even if they do, having a robust I/O, modern networking features, and sufficient expansion slots is more important than a good-looking design.
So, instead of chasing a particular look, I’d focus on features like VRM temperatures, high-speed USB ports, sufficient M.2 slots, and advanced Ethernet and Wi-Fi standards. It doesn’t even cost a lot to get these features on a motherboard these days — $150 can get you most of the way.
CPU cores
It’s more about quality than quantity
There was a time when I could only dream of choosing the CPU of my choice, let alone spending on high-core-count chips. When it was time to pick the CPU for my existing build, I picked the 8-core Ryzen 7 5700X instead of the 6-core Ryzen 5 5600X. I had never owned an 8-core CPU before, and couldn’t control myself from splurging a bit, despite knowing that the additional cores would yield next to no benefits in gaming. Saving the premium I spent on the 8-core processor would have allowed me to get a bigger SSD, PSU, or AIO cooler, either of which would have been a more impactful upgrade.
I’m going back to a 6-core CPU on my next build, whenever that happens. Single-core performance remains the determining factor for games, and 6 cores are enough to draw the line. Gaming will remain my primary use case for the foreseeable future, and even an 8-core X3D processor would be overkill for the kind of GPU I intend to buy. I won’t lose any real gaming performance by opting for a 6-core chip, and can spend more on the other components of the build. Unless you’re running multicore applications regularly or putting together a home lab, having more cores is a waste of money.
Your expensive CPU was a waste of money — here’s why
Your high-end CPU is a mere spectator inside your PC
SSD DRAM
It’s not as critical as you think
DRAM cache is a dedicated chip on some SSDs that helps them speed up certain operations. DRAM-less SSDs are susceptible to dropping performance when hit with a sustained load. However, the practical difference for most gamers is negligible. What DRAM does is store the mapping table for the SSD, informing the controller about the location of particular pieces of data on the NAND flash. This can significantly boost drive performance as it doesn’t have to waste time clearing filled blocks for new data to be written. That said, the benefits are only applicable in write-heavy workloads, such as video editing and working on large datasets. Most games don’t experience a tangible improvement in performance on a DRAM vs. DRAM-less SSD.
DRAM-less SSDs make use of a part of the system memory, designated HMB (Host Memory Buffer), to simulate DRAM cache. The performance is naturally worse, but these drives have gotten quite good over time, and most users will never feel the difference. If the price difference between a DRAM and a DRAM-less drive isn’t huge, you should buy the DRAM SSD. However, modern DRAM-less drives are pretty good now, so if decent savings are to be made, you can pick them without any problems.
5 SSD specs I always focus on instead of transfer speeds
Every SSD is fast enough, but here’s what truly matters
GPU VRAM
I’m looking at performance instead
The amount of VRAM on modern GPUs has been a sensitive topic for gamers, and for good reason. While newer titles have ramped up the demand for VRAM, even at 1080p resolution, graphics cards haven’t kept pace. Even after spending over $500 on an RTX 5070, you’re expected to make do with just 12GB of VRAM. Companies like AMD and Intel are doing better in this regard, but the situation is far from where it should be. That said, I’ve decided there’s no point crying about it anymore. GPU manufacturers will continue to use VRAM as an upselling tactic, and given the ongoing DRAM shortage in the industry, things aren’t going to improve anytime soon.
The next GPU I buy will not have 8GB or 12GB of VRAM. I’ll limit myself to 16GB cards, and AMD is sure to have a decent offering with 16GB (or more) VRAM when I make my purchase decision. The RX 9070 XT, for around $600, packs 16GB of VRAM, and is a 4K-capable GPU in modern games. Even if I’m going high-end, the RTX 5070 Ti and RTX 5080 have 16GB of VRAM each. While that isn’t perfect, especially on high-end GPUs, it’s still enough for now. I’ve decided to take my mind off VRAM limitations and focus on performance benchmarks alone. If the GPU I’m buying is able to deliver a great experience in the latest games without running into insufficient VRAM, I’m good. I know it sounds defeatist, but as PC gamers, we have to take what we get in this economy.
Ray tracing has silently become mandatory, but modern GPUs didn’t get the memo
Always-on ray tracing needs more powerful GPUs, not software gimmicks
RAM speed
Capacity is all we can aim for right now
The ongoing memory crisis has affected RAM prices the most. Consumer memory kits have quadrupled in price over the last four months, and many PC builders have had to delay their upgrade plans indefinitely. In such a market, obsessing over high-speed memory kits is out of the question. Even a humble 32GB kit of DDR5-6000 CL30 RAM costs almost $400 right now. If I’m moving from AM4 to AM5 in 2026, I’m going to focus on RAM capacity instead of speed or latency. The used market will be my only option if I want to build an AM5 PC. I’ll still be overpaying for memory, but it’ll be the lesser of two evils.
Transfer speeds on DDR5 memory don’t even deliver a proportional increase in performance. In fact, gaming FPS plateaus after 6,000-6,400MT/s, making it the sweet spot right now. Hence, it’s best to forget about fancy high-end RAM, hunt for decent deals on the secondary market, and aim for 32GB of RAM above anything else.
5 PC upgrades you’ll actually be able to afford in 2026
These components shouldn’t be as affected by the RAMpocalypse
Don’t miss the forest for the trees
In the race to build the best PC you can, don’t mistake specs for everything. Not every PC specification translates to real-world performance. They’re general indicators, but focus on relevant benchmarks instead of long-winded arguments about this or that specification. Most PC users don’t benefit from high core counts, DRAM cache, or excessive VRAM. It can feel like you’re future-proofing your PC, but by the time that future arrives, it could look very different from what you imagined.
