Popp, A. et al. Land-use transition for bioenergy and climate stabilization: model comparison of drivers, impacts and interactions with other land use based mitigation options. Clim. Change 123, 495–509 (2014).
Egerer, S. et al. How to measure the efficiency of bioenergy crops compared to forestation. Biogeosciences 21, 5005–5025 (2024).
Hanssen, S. V. et al. The climate change mitigation potential of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 1023–1029 (2020).
Butnar, I. et al. A deep dive into the modelling assumptions for biomass with carbon capture and storage (BECCS): a transparency exercise. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 084008 (2020).
Fuss, S. et al. Negative emissions—part 2: costs, potentials and side effects. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 063002 (2018).
Searchinger, T. D., Beringer, T. & Strong, A. Does the world have bioenergy potential from the dedicated use of land? Energy Policy 110, 434–446 (2017).
Duval-Dachary, S. et al. Life cycle assessment of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage systems: critical review of life cycle inventories. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 183, 113415 (2023).
Salas, D. A., Boero, A. J. & Ramirez, A. D. Life cycle assessment of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 199, 114458 (2024).
Fajardy, M. & Dowell, N. M. Can BECCS deliver sustainable and resource efficient negative emissions?. Energy Environ. Sci. 10, 1389–1426 (2017).
Pröll, T. & Zerobin, F. Biomass-based negative emission technology options with combined heat and power generation. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change 24, 1307–1324 (2019).
Liu, W., Yu, Z., Xie, X., von Gadow, K. & Peng, C. A critical analysis of the carbon neutrality assumption in life cycle assessment of forest bioenergy systems. Environ. Rev. 26, 93–101 (2018).
Williams, R. H. in Eco-Restructuring: Implications for Sustainable Development (eds Ayers, R. U. & Weaver, P. M.) 180–222 (United Nations Univ. Press, 1998).
Haberl, H. et al. Correcting a fundamental error in greenhouse gas accounting related to bioenergy. Energy Policy 45, 18–23 (2012).
Searchinger, T. D. et al. Fixing a critical climate accounting error. Science 326, 527–528 (2009).
Booth, M. S. & Giuntoli, J. Burning up the carbon sink: how the EU’s forest biomass policy undermines climate mitigation. GCB Bioenergy 17, e70035 (2025).
Frequently Asked Questions, Q2-10 (IPCC Task Force on Greenhouse Gas Emissions, accessed 31 March 2026); https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/faq/faq.html
Commentary by the European Academies’ Science Advisory Council (EASAC) on Forest Bioenergy and Carbon Neutrality (EASAC, 2018); https://easac.eu/fileadmin/PDF_s/reports_statements/Carbon_Neutrality/EASAC_commentary_on_Carbon_Neutrality_15_June_2018.pdf
Searchinger, T. et al. Europe’s renewable energy directive poised to harm global forests. Nat. Commun. 9, 3741 (2018).
Peng, L., Searchinger, T. D., Zionts, J. & Waite, R. The carbon costs of global wood harvests. Nature 620, 110–115 (2023).
Smith, B., Sekar, A., Mirletz, H., Heath, G. & Margolis, R. An Updated Life Cycle Assessment of Utility-Scale Solar Photovoltaic Systems Installed in the United States NREL/TP-7A40-87372 (NREL, 2024); https://doi.org/10.2172/2331420
Kröhnert, H., Frehner, A. & Stucki, M. Life Cycle Inventories of Wind Energy: Electricity Generation from Onshore and Offshore Wind Farms for the Swiss and European Context (Institute of Natural Resource Sciences, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Wädenswil, on behalf of the Federal Office for the Environment and the Swiss Federal Office of Energy, 2025).
Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2024 (International Renewable Energy Agency, 2025).
Negri, V. et al. Life cycle optimization of BECCS supply chains in the European Union. Appl. Energy 298, 117252 (2021).
Weimann, G. G. & Bentsen, N. S. Potential for carbon dioxide removal of carbon capture and storage on biomass-fired combined heat and power production. GCB Bioenergy 16, e13184 (2024).
Briones-Hidrovo, A., Copa Rey, J. R., Cláudia Dias, A., Tarelho, L. A. C. & Beauchet, S. Assessing a bio-energy system with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) through dynamic life cycle assessment and land–water–energy nexus. Energy Convers. Manag. 268, 116014 (2022).
An Analysis of UK Biomass Power Policy (RISI, 2015).
Regulation (EU) 2024/1991 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 June 2024 on Nature Restoration and Amending Regulation (EU) 2022/869 (EU, 2024).
Chaudhary, A., Burivalova, Z., Koh, L. P. & Hellweg, S. Impact of forest management on species richness: global meta-analysis and economic trade-offs. Sci. Rep. 6, 23954 (2016).
James, J. & Harrison, R. The effect of harvest on forest soil carbon: a meta-analysis. Forests 7, 308 (2016).
Riutta, T. et al. Major and persistent shifts in below-ground carbon dynamics and soil respiration following logging in tropical forests. Glob. Chang. Biol. 27, 2225–2240 (2021).
Buchholz, T., Gunn, J. S. & Sharma, B. When biomass electricity demand prompts thinnings in southern US pine plantations: a forest sector greenhouse gas emissions case study. Front. For. Glob. Change 4, 642569 (2021).
Williams, M. & Pepper, E. The BECCS Hoax: Using Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage Is a Bad Bet for United Kingdom’s Net Zero Goal (Natural Resources Defense Council, 2024).
Withey, P., Johnston, C. & Guo, J. Quantifying the global warming potential of carbon dioxide emissions from bioenergy with carbon capture and storage. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 115, 109408 (2019).
Ellis, P. W. et al. Reduced-impact logging for climate change mitigation (RIL-C) can halve selective logging emissions from tropical forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 438, 255–266 (2019).
Anerud, E., Bergström, D., Routa, J. & Eliasson, L. Fuel quality and dry matter losses of stored wood chips—influence of cover material. Biomass Bioenergy 150, 106109 (2021).
Huang, Y. et al. A global map of root biomass across the world’s forests. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 13, 4263–4274 (2021).
Zhang, X. & Wang, W. The decomposition of fine and coarse roots: their global patterns and controlling factors. Sci. Rep. 5, 9940 (2015).
Ma, H. et al. The global biogeography of tree leaf form and habit. Nat. Plants 9, 1795–1809 (2023).
Iversen, C. M. et al. A global Fine-Root Ecology Database to address below-ground challenges in plant ecology. New Phytol. 215, 15–26 (2017).
Brown, M. L., Canham, C. D., Murphy, L. & Donovan, T. M. Timber harvest as the predominant disturbance regime in northeastern U.S. forests: effects of harvest intensification. Ecosphere 9, e02062 (2018).
Brown, M. L., Canham, C. D., Buchholz, T., Gunn, J. S. & Donovan, T. M. Net carbon sequestration implications of intensified timber harvest in northeastern U.S. forests. Ecosphere 15, e4758 (2024).
Titus, B. et al. Sustainable forest biomass: a review of current residue harvesting guidelines. Energy Sustain. Soc. 11, 10 (2021).
Bessaad, A., Bilger, I. & Korboulewsky, N. Assessing biomass removal and woody debris in whole-tree harvesting system: are the recommended levels of residues ensured? Forests 12, 807 (2021).
Weedon, J. T. et al. Global meta-analysis of wood decomposition rates: a role for trait variation among tree species? Ecol. Lett. 12, 45–56 (2009).
Kattge, J. et al. TRY plant trait database—enhanced coverage and open access. Glob. Chang. Biol. 26, 119–188 (2020).
Röder, M., Whittaker, C. & Thornley, P. How certain are greenhouse gas reductions from bioenergy? Life cycle assessment and uncertainty analysis of wood pellet-to-electricity supply chains from forest residues. Biomass Bioenergy 79, 50–63 (2015).
Giuntoli, J. et al. Solid and Gaseous Bioenergy Pathways: Input Values and GHG Emissions: Calculated According to the Methodology Set in COM(2010) 11 and SWD(2014) 259 (Publications Office, Luxembourg, 2015).
Quiggin, D. BECCS Deployment: The Risks of Policies Forging Ahead of the Evidence (Chatham House, 2021).
Smolkin, Y. V. et al. Thermal and economic efficiency of CHP plants. Power Technol. Eng. 58, 836–840 (2025).
Combined Heat and Power Basics (US Department of Energy, accessed 31 March 2026); https://www.energy.gov/eere/iedo/combined-heat-and-power-basics
Isoli, N. & Chaczykowski, M. Net energy analysis and net carbon benefits of CO2 capture and transport infrastructure for energy applications and industrial clusters. Appl. Energy 382, 125227 (2025).
Gustafsson, K., Sadegh-Vaziri, R., Grönkvist, S., Levihn, F. & Sundberg, C. BECCS with combined heat and power: assessing the energy penalty. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 108, 103248 (2021).
Schlissel, D. & Kalegha, M. Carbon Capture at Boundary Dam 3 Still an Underperforming Failure (Energy Media, 2024); https://energi.media/news/carbon-capture-at-boundary-dam-3-still-an-underperforming-failure/
W. A. Parish Post-Combustion CO2 Capture and Sequestration Demonstration Project (USDOE, 2020); https://publications.ieaghg.org/insightpapers/2020-IP11%20DOE%20report%20on%20Petra%20Nova.pdf
Hoover, C. M., Bagdon, B. & Gagnon, A. Standard Estimates of Forest Ecosystem Carbon for Forest Types of the United States (USDA Forest Service, 2021); https://www.fs.usda.gov/research/treesearch/63638
Prussi, M., Yugo, M., De Prada, L., Padella, M. & Edwards, R. JEC Well-to-Wheels Report v.5 (JRC Publications Repository, 2020); https://doi.org/10.2760/100379
Combined Cycle Gas-Turbines: Energy Efficiency Compendium (IPIECA, 2022).
Fajardy, M. et al. The economics of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) deployment in a 1.5 °C or 2 °C world. Glob. Environ. Change 68, 102262 (2021).
Quiggin, D. Why Engineered Carbon Removals Are at Odds with Energy Security and Affordability: Tackling the Costs and Risks in Net Zero Strategies (Chatham House, 2024).
Quarterly Report on European Gas Markets (Market Observatory for Energy, 2024).
