LIVE NEWS
  • Virginia voters deciding on redistricting plan that could boost Democrats
  • This missing vitamin could stop cancer cells in their tracks
  • OpenAI Codex Chronicle captures your Mac screen to build AI context, with cloud processing and no encryption
  • Japan to Sell More Weapons Abroad, Breaking With Postwar Pacifism
  • Bobyard 2.0 offers improved takeoffs and unified AI for estimators
  • US pressure puts World Bank’s climate plan at risk
  • News Wrap: Patel sues The Atlantic over story alleging excessive drinking and absences
  • AACR in 30 Seconds: CAR-T promise, Merck’s new move, rural health
Prime Reports
  • Home
  • Popular Now
  • Crypto
  • Cybersecurity
  • Economy
  • Geopolitics
  • Global Markets
  • Politics
  • See More
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Climate Risks
    • Defense
    • Healthcare Innovation
    • Science
    • Technology
    • World
Prime Reports
  • Home
  • Popular Now
  • Crypto
  • Cybersecurity
  • Economy
  • Geopolitics
  • Global Markets
  • Politics
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Climate Risks
  • Defense
  • Healthcare Innovation
  • Science
  • Technology
  • World
Home»Science»‘Something’s missing’: Most thorough-ever study of the cosmos proves we still can’t explain how the universe is expanding
Science

‘Something’s missing’: Most thorough-ever study of the cosmos proves we still can’t explain how the universe is expanding

primereportsBy primereportsApril 15, 2026No Comments5 Mins Read
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
‘Something’s missing’: Most thorough-ever study of the cosmos proves we still can’t explain how the universe is expanding
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


There’s a central crisis in cosmology: Different measurements yield different values for the expansion rate of the universe. Now, a comprehensive analysis combining decades of independent measurements suggests that this discrepancy is not due to error or uncertainty; instead, it’s a potential pathway to new physics beyond the standard cosmological model.

Astronomers calculate the universe’s expansion rate, or Hubble constant, in two ways. One method is to use measurements of the distance to the cosmic microwave background (CMB), the earliest light that spread out just 380,000 years after the Big Bang. The second method is to study the expansion of the local universe, using observations of “standard candles,” nearby stars of a known brightness whose light gets stretched — or redshifted — as it reaches us.

The first method’s calculations yield a Hubble constant of around 67 or 68 kilometers per second per megaparsec, while the latter yield a value of approximately 73 kilometers per second per megaparsec. (One megaparsec is about 3.26 million light-years.)


You may like

Although this seems like a diminutive discrepancy, it is far greater than statistical uncertainty can explain, presenting a puzzling disagreement known as the Hubble tension. So a large symposium of astronomers convened to vote on the best methods and data for constraining the Hubble constant and determining if the tension actually exists.

In the resulting paper, published April 10 in the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics, the authors derived the most precise Hubble constant yet and found that the tension persists, suggesting that our current cosmological model is incomplete.

“That’s why the Hubble tension is so interesting,” study co-author Richard Anderson, an astrophysicist at the University of Göttingen, told Live Science via email. “The comparison between the late and early-universe value of [the Hubble constant] tests basic physics on cosmological scales, and it tells us that something’s missing.”

The most comprehensive review of the expanding local universe

Previous cosmological calculations relied on the creation of a cosmic distance ladder. Its rungs comprise increasingly distant celestial objects, including pulsating Cepheid variable stars within the Milky Way and more distant supernovas, whose distances can be calculated from the difference in their intrinsic brightness versus how bright they appear to us after their light has traveled through expanding space.

Get the world’s most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.

Yet this recent community effort, launched at the International Space Science Institute Breakthrough Workshop in Bern, Switzerland, in March 2025, expanded the cosmic distance ladder into a comprehensive survey of the nearby universe called the Local Distance Network, achieving a lofty goal that was considered “potentially unreachable” a decade ago.

A route map showing various labeled stops in the cosmic distance ladder with geometry on the left and the Hubble constant on the right, all against a yellow background

The new Local Distance Network presented in this study. (Image credit: International Space Science Institute, 2026)

“This isn’t just a new value of the Hubble constant,” the researchers explained in a statement from the National Science Foundation’s NOIRLab; “it’s a community-built framework that brings decades of independent distance measurements together, transparently and accessibly.”

The unified framework combined decades of independent research using various techniques that may overlap in observations to achieve “redundancy” ‪—‬ an invaluable technique to reduce systematic errors and statistical anomalies.


What to read next

For example, it allowed the researchers to perform a series of “leave me out” analyses: By excluding a specific technique, such as Cepheid-based calculations, they found a minimal change in the overall results of their newly constrained Hubble constant.

The foundations for a cosmic network

The Local Distance Network is founded on anchors — celestial objects whose distances have been determined geometrically through methods like parallax, an apparent change in an object’s position that occurs with a change in perspective. Space telescope access may be limited, but you can reproduce parallax yourself by holding a finger at arm’s length and seeing it seemingly shift positions by closing one eye and then the other.

Accordingly, the researchers used multiple local-universe anchor points, including the galaxy NGC 4258, located more than 20 million light-years away; the Magellanic Clouds, which are a pair of dwarf galaxies about 200,000 light-years away; and numerous variable stars within the Milky Way.

Then, they included a multitude of objects of measured distances, including dying old red giant stars and “megamasers,” the intensely bright cosmic lasers generated in the accretion disks of supermassive black holes.

The researchers also included more than 7,500 galaxies, observed by facilities such as the Hubble Space Telescope and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, out to a distance of more than 1 billion light-years.

As a result, the Local Distance Network developed in this study represents the most precise direct measurement of the Hubble constant in the local universe: 73.50 kilometers per second per megaparsec, with a relative uncertainty of 1.09%. The conclusion? The Hubble tension is real, similar to previously measured values, and not just an artifact.

The fact that this discrepancy persists may hint that early-universe measurements need to be similarly reassessed on a deeper level.

“One interesting, relatively new, and perhaps more natural idea involves primordial magnetic fields, which could change the scale of the structure seen in the CMB,” study co-author John Blakeslee, director of research and science services at NOIRLab, explained via email.

Excitingly, this research further supports the idea that new physics are needed to illuminate dark energy and the other forces driving the expansion and ultimate fate of the universe. And because this framework is modular, upcoming methods and data from next-generation observatories may finally resolve the Hubble tension — but then again, that’s what cosmologists have been hoping for more than a decade.

Casertano, S., Anand, G., Anderson, R. I., Beaton, R., Bhardwaj, A., Blakeslee, J. P., Boubel, P., Breuval, L., Brout, D., Cantiello, M., Reyes, M. C., Csörnyei, G., De Jaeger, T., Dhawan, S., Di Valentino, E., Galbany, L., Gil-Marín, H., Graczyk, D., Huang, C., . . . Nota, A. (2026). The Local Distance Network: A community consensus report on the measurement of the Hubble constant at ∼1% precision. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 708, A166. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202557993

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleTrump’s attacks on the pope are unprecedented, religious experts say : NPR
Next Article US Air Force debuts operational AI wargame system
primereports
  • Website

Related Posts

Science

A giant ‘shadow’ has been creeping across Mars for 50 years — and scientists aren’t sure why

April 20, 2026
Science

Increasing heat can boost malnutrition among children

April 20, 2026
Science

After 200 years scientists finally crack the “dolomite problem”

April 20, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

Global Resources Outlook 2024 | UNEP

December 6, 20258 Views

The D Brief: DHS shutdown likely; US troops leave al-Tanf; CNO’s plea to industry; Crowded robot-boat market; And a bit more.

February 14, 20264 Views

German Chancellor Merz faces difficult mission to Israel – DW – 12/06/2025

December 6, 20254 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • TikTok
  • WhatsApp
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Latest Reviews

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest tech news from FooBar about tech, design and biz.

PrimeReports.org
Independent global news, analysis & insights.

PrimeReports.org brings you in-depth coverage of geopolitics, markets, technology and risk – with context that helps you understand what really matters.

Editorially independent · Opinions are those of the authors and not investment advice.
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn YouTube
Key Sections
  • World
  • Geopolitics
  • Popular Now
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cybersecurity
  • Crypto
All Categories
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Climate Risks
  • Crypto
  • Cybersecurity
  • Defense
  • Economy
  • Geopolitics
  • Global Markets
  • Healthcare Innovation
  • Politics
  • Popular Now
  • Science
  • Technology
  • World
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Disclaimer
  • Cookie Policy
  • DMCA / Copyright Notice
  • Editorial Policy

Sign up for Prime Reports Briefing – essential stories and analysis in your inbox.

By subscribing you agree to our Privacy Policy. You can opt out anytime.
Latest Stories
  • Virginia voters deciding on redistricting plan that could boost Democrats
  • This missing vitamin could stop cancer cells in their tracks
  • OpenAI Codex Chronicle captures your Mac screen to build AI context, with cloud processing and no encryption
© 2026 PrimeReports.org. All rights reserved.
Privacy Terms Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.