IPCC: Summary for Policymakers. In Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (eds McCarthy, J. J. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2001).
IPCC: Summary for Policymakers. In Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (eds Pörtner, H.-O. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022).
Glantz, M. H. in Climate Change Research: Evaluation and Policy Implications (eds Zwerver, S. et al.) 41–54 (Elsevier, 1995).
Oldfield, J. D. Mikhail Budyko’s (1920–2001) contributions to global climate science: from heat balances to climate change and global ecology. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 7, 682–692 (2016).
Bolin, B. A History of the Science and Politics of Climate Change: The Role of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).
IPCC Climate Change: The IPCC Impacts Assessment (eds Tegart, W. J. McG. et al.) (Australian Government Publishing Service, 1990).
Fox-Kemper, B. et al. in Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) 1211–1362 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).
Da Cunha, C. et al. Adaptive capacity for climate change: local initiatives and federal planning. The case of Tiksi, Sakha Republic, Russia. Polar Sci. 31, 100761 (2022).
Huntington, H. P. et al. Effects of Arctic commercial shipping on environments and communities: context, governance, priorities. Transp. Res. D 118, 103731 (2023).
Wang, H., Zhang, Y. & Meng, Q. How will the opening of the Northern Sea route influence the Suez Canal route? An empirical analysis with discrete choice models. Transp. Res. A 107, 75–89 (2018).
Edwards, R. & Evans, A. The challenges of marine spatial planning in the Arctic: results from the ACCESS programme. Ambio 46, 486–496 (2017).
Smieszek, M., Young, O. R., Hoel, A. H. & Singh, K. The state and challenges of Arctic governance in an era of transformation. One Earth 4, 1665–1670 (2021).
Johannsdottir, L., Cook, D. & Arruda, G. M. Systemic risk of cruise ship incidents from an Arctic and insurance perspective. Elementa Sci. Anthrop. 9, 00009 (2021).
Tiller, S. J. et al. Exploring the impact of climate change on Arctic shipping through the lenses of quadruple bottom line and sustainable development goals. Sustainability 14, 2193 (2022).
Bennett, M. M., Stephenson, S. R., Yang, K., Bravo, M. T. & De Jonghe, B. The opening of the Transpolar Sea route: logistical, geopolitical, environmental, and socioeconomic impacts. Mar. Policy 121, 104178 (2020).
Mendenhall, E. et al. Climate change increases the risk of fisheries conflict. Mar. Policy 117, 103954 (2020).
Ford, J. D., Pearce, T., Canosa, I. V. & Harper, S. The rapidly changing Arctic and its societal implications. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 12, e735 (2021). This paper provides community, livelihood and social justice perspectives on the impacts of rapid climate change in the Arctic. The opportunities presented by reduced sea cover for natural resource extraction of minerals and fisheries and for shipping are shown to face legal, infrastructural and economic challenges and constraints.
Mosoni, C., Hildén, M., Fronzek, S., Reyer, C. P. O. & Carter, T. R. Cross-border dimensions of Arctic climate change impacts and implications for Europe. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 15, e905 (2024).
IPCC: Summary for Policymakers. In Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (eds Parry, M. L. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).
Füssel, H.-M. & Klein, R. J. T. Climate change vulnerability assessments: an evolution of conceptual thinking. Climatic Change 75, 301–329 (2006).
Carter, T. R. et al. in Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (eds Parry, M. L. et al.) 133–171 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).
IPCC Special Report on Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation (eds Field, C. B. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012).
IPCC Annex I: Glossary (eds Reisinger, A. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2023).
European Climate Risk Assessment (European Environment Agency & Publications Office of the European Union, 2024).
Schipper, E. L. F. et al. in Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (eds Pörtner, H.-O. et al.) 2655–2807 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022).
New, M. et al. in Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (eds Pörtner, H.-O. et al.) 2539–2654 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022).
Bednar-Friedl, B. et al. in Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (eds Pörtner, H.-O. et al.) 1817–1927 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022).
O’Neill, B. et al. in Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (eds Pörtner, H.-O. et al.) 2411–2538 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022).
Decision: Chapter Outline of the Working Group II Contribution to the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) (IPCC, 2017).
Chapter Outlines of the Working Group II Contribution to the IPCC Seventh Assessment Report (AR7) (IPCC, 2025).
Watkiss, P. & Betts, R. A. in The Third UK Climate Change Risk Assessment Technical Report (eds Betts, R. A. et al.) (Climate Change Committee, 2021). This report describes the assessment method applied in the Third UK Climate Change Risk Assessment, where climate change opportunities were assessed alongside, but separately from, climate change risks.
Brown, I. & Berry, P. National Climate Change Risk Assessments to inform adaptation policy priorities and environmental sustainability outcomes: a knowledge systems perspective. Climatic Change 175, 13 (2022). This paper focuses on environmental sustainability outcomes, discussing how opportunities are handled in the Third UK Climate Change Risk Assessment and the challenges posed for methodological consistency, interpretation of evidence, and understanding dynamic interdependencies between opportunities and risks.
Davidson, D. J. & Kecinski, M. Emotional pathways to climate change responses. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 13, e751 (2022).
Mayer, A. & Smith, E. K. Unstoppable climate change? The influence of fatalistic beliefs about climate change on behavioural change and willingness to pay cross-nationally. Clim. Policy 19, 511–523 (2019).
National Climate Change Risk Assessment for Aotearoa New Zealand: Main Report (Ministry for the Environment, 2020). An example of a national climate change risk assessment that treats opportunities alongside but separately from risks, also identifying information and data gaps.
Climate Risk Analysis for Switzerland: Basis for Adaptation to Climate Change. Abridged Version (Federal Office for the Environment, 2025).
IPCC Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (eds Parry, M. L. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).
Niang, I. et al. in Climate Change: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (eds Barros, V. R. et al.) 1199–1265 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
Magrin, G. O. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (eds Barros, V. R. et al.) 1499–1566 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Sixteenth Session, held in Cancun from 29 November to 10 December 2010 FCCC/CP/2010/7Add.1, Decision 1/CP.16 (UNFCCC, 2011); https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2010/cop16/eng/07a01.pdf
Government Report on Finland’s National Climate Change Adaptation Plan until 2030: Wellbeing, Safety and Security in a Changing Climate (Finnish Government, 2024).
Fifth National Climate Assessment (US Global Change Research Program, 2023); https://toolkit.climate.gov/sites/default/files/2025-07/NCA5_2023_FullReport.pdf
Presentation Document PNACC 3: France Adapts—Living at +4 °C (Government of France, 2025); https://www.ecologie.gouv.fr/sites/default/files/documents/PNACC_EN_VF_2.pdf
Kahlenborn, W. et al. Climate Impact and Risk Assessment 2021 for Germany: Summary (German Environment Agency, 2021).
Berrang-Ford, L. et al. A systematic global stocktake of evidence on human adaptation to climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 989–1000 (2021).
Ruane, A. C. et al. The climatic impact-driver framework for assessment of risk-relevant climate information. Earths Future 10, e2022EF002803 (2022).
Simpson, N. P. et al. A framework for complex climate change risk assessment. One Earth 4, 489–501 (2021). This paper proposes an addition to the standard IPCC framing, recognizing that risks can arise not only from potential impacts due to climate change but also from responses to those impacts (including adaptation and mitigation).
Gannon, K. E. et al. Adaptation to climate change in the UK wine sector. Clim. Risk Manag. 42, 100572 (2023). This paper reports an example of private sector adaptation that focuses, unusually, on both the opportunities and risks of climate change. Businesses increasingly view climate change as an opportunity for the UK wine sector, but there are also risks that can propagate along value chains.
Preston, I. et al. Climate Change and Social Justice: An Evidence Review (Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 2014).
Kuhl, L. Policy making under scarcity: reflections for designing socially just climate adaptation policy. One Earth 4, 202–212 (2021).
Juhola, S., Heikkinen, M., Pietilä, T., Groundstroem, F. & Käyhkö, J. Connecting climate justice and adaptation planning: an adaptation justice index. Environ. Sci. Policy 136, 609–619 (2022). This paper proposes an adaptation justice index comprising four dimensions of climate justice: recognitional, distributive, procedural and restorative. Note that restorative justice is often folded into distributive justice.
Watkiss, P., Cimato, F., Hunt, A. & Moxey, A. The Impacts of Climate Change on Meeting Government Outcomes in England (Paul Watkiss Associates, 2019).
Amorim-Maia, A. T. & Olazabal, M. Beyond adjustment: a new paradigm for climate change adaptation in a complex world. Glob. Environ. Change 93, 103027 (2025). This paper proposes an updated heuristic framework for adaptation as a process of responding to climate change and its impacts by integrating risk reduction with other emerging paradigms relating to justice, resilience or development. The authors call for a reconceptualization of adaptation beyond mere adjustment to risks.
Schlosberg, D. & Collins, L. B. From environmental to climate justice: climate change and the discourse of environmental justice. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 5, 359–374 (2014).
Arneth, A. et al. in Special Report on Climate Change and Land (eds Shukla, P. R. et al.) 77–129 (IPCC, 2019).
Pelling, M. et al. Normative future visioning for city resilience and development. Clim. Dev. 16, 335–348 (2024).
Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (United Nations, 2015).
Decision 2/CMA.5, Global Goal on Adaptation. Decisions adopted by the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement 22–28 (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 2024); https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/cma2023_16a01_adv_.pdf
Butler, J. R. A. et al. Adapting scenarios for climate adaptation: practitioners’ perspectives on a popular planning method. Environ. Sci. Policy 104, 13–19 (2020).
O’Neill, B. C. et al. A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways. Climatic Change 122, 387–400 (2014).
Pedde, S. et al. Emerging regional perspectives of global climate change scenarios: a systematic review. Climatic Change 178, 122 (2025).
Ranasinghe, R. et al. in Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis (Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) 1767–1926 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).
Tebaldi, C. et al. Climate model projections from the Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) of CMIP6. Earth Syst. Dyn. 12, 253–293 (2021).
IPCC: Summary for Policymakers. In Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis (Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).
Dunne, J. P. et al. An evolving Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 7 (CMIP7) and Fast Track in support of future climate assessment. Geosci. Model Dev. 18, 6671–6700 (2025).
Shayegh, S., Moreno-Cruz, J. & Caldeira, K. Adapting to rates versus amounts of climate change: a case of adaptation to sea-level rise. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 104007 (2016).
Martin, R. A., da Silva, C. R. B., Moore, M. P. & Diamond, S. E. When will a changing climate outpace adaptive evolution? Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 14, e852 (2023).
Berkhout, F. Social limits to climate change adaptation: temporalities in behavioural responses to climate risks. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 71, 101471 (2024).
Kriegler, E. et al. A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared climate policy assumptions. Climatic Change 122, 401–414 (2014).
Pedde, S. et al. Advancing the use of scenarios to understand society’s capacity to achieve the 1.5 degree target. Glob. Environ. Change 56, 75–85 (2019).
Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC, 1992).
O’Brien, K. L. & Leichenko, R. M. Winners and losers in the context of global change. Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr. 93, 89–103 (2003). This paper suggests two perspectives, illustrated using climate change, for interpreting different attitudes towards addressing winners and losers. One is as a natural and inevitable consequence of ecological or economic processes; the second is as being generated deliberately by inequitable and political conditions.
Pielke, R., Prins, G., Rayner, S. & Sarewitz, D. Lifting the taboo on adaptation. Nature 445, 597–598 (2007).
Carrico, A. R., Truelove, H. B., Vandenbergh, M. P. & Dana, D. Does learning about climate change adaptation change support for mitigation? J. Environ. Psychol. 41, 19–29 (2015).
Jebari, J. et al. From moral hazard to risk-response feedback. Clim. Risk Manag. 33, 100324 (2021).
IPCC Preliminary Guidelines for Assessing Impacts of Climate Change (eds Carter, T. R. et al.) (Environmental Change Unit & Center for Global Environmental Research, 1992).
IPCC IPCC Technical Guidelines for Assessing Climate Change Impacts and Adaptations (eds Carter, T. R. et al.) (Univ. College London & Center for Global Environmental Research, 1994).
Burton, I. in Adapting to Climate Change: An International Perspective (eds Smith, J. B. et al.) 55–67 (Springer, 1996).
Smit, B. et al. in Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (eds McCarthy, J. J. et al.) 877–912 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2001). This IPCC chapter addresses climate change adaptation, covering many of the historical developments and controversies about the impacts of and adaptation to climate change, their interpretation and arguments concerning the complementary role of adaptation, as a response to climate change, alongside mitigation.
Smith, J. B. et al. in Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (eds McCarthy, J. J. et al.) 913–967 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2001).
Zommers, Z. et al. Burning embers: towards more transparent and robust climate-change risk assessments. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 1, 516–529 (2020).
Marbaix, P., Magnan, A. K., Muccione, V., Thorne, P. W. & Zommers, Z. Climate change risks illustrated by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) “burning embers”. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 17, 317–349 (2025).
Roberts, E. & Huq, S. Coming full circle: the history of loss and damage under the UNFCCC. Int. J. Glob. Warm. 8, 141–157 (2015).
Dorkenoo, K., Scown, M. & Boyd, E. A critical review of disproportionality in loss and damage from climate change. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 13, e770 (2022).
Otto, F. E. L., Skeie, R. B., Fuglestvedt, J. S., Berntsen, T. & Allen, M. R. Assigning historic responsibility for extreme weather events. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 757–759 (2017).
King, A. D., Grose, M. R., Kimutai, J., Pinto, I. & Harrington, L. J. Event attribution is not ready for a major role in loss and damage. Nat. Clim. Change 13, 415–417 (2023).
Noy, I. et al. Event attribution is ready to inform loss and damage negotiations. Nat. Clim. Change 13, 1279–1281 (2023).
